Stay with me, friends. This post is going to start off with a lot of seemingly self-indulgent data about me and my workouts. I feel that’s necessary background for the rest of the post to make sense.
As many of you know, working out is a big part of my life. I get up at 5 am most mornings and head to the gym for a little over an hour. With some minor variations, this has been my routine for about 10 years. For the 10 years before that, I trained sporadically, resulting in about 20 years during which I bought into a fairly uniform methodology and workout philosophy. My primary goal was simple. I have always had a very high metabolism, and for much of my life I starved my body of protein. I didn’t know I was doing so, but I’ve had a limited taste for meat, a relatively small appetite, and a general disinterest in food, other than as a means to survive. Those characteristics kept my body weight at about 165 during periods when I wasn’t training aggressively, and drifting up to about 175 if I went through a spell of training intensely, pounding myoplex shakes and supplements, and really focusing on bulking up. Everything I read, and everyone to whom I spoke who had a reasonable claim to knowledge, had one common theme: to gain mass, do low-rep sets to failure; to gain strength and get ripped, do higher numbers of reps with lower weight. Given my goals, I’ve always trained in the 6-8 rep range, and I’ve become, over the years, very strong for my size. With a body weight of around 175-180, I’ve maxed my single-rep barbell bench press to over 340 Lbs, and would alternate this with dumbbell flat bench presses using 110 lb dumbbells in each hand (the highest I’ve had available in some of the gyms at which I’ve trained). I’ll leave it at that, rather than indulge myself further and bore my few readers with a laundry list of my maxes across exercises. Suffice it to say, I’ve long been strong for my size. Not stronger than the monsters, mind you, but strong for a lean 175-180 lb-er. I’m not alone in this approach or in the corresponding results. One of my closest friends, Brian Wallins, is even leaner than me, and of comparable strength. When we used to train together, the “big” guys were sure we were going to hurt ourselves when they’d see us set up with the dumbbells, as we were moving more weight than they were, in most cases, and training with more intensity.
But I can feel my metabolism slowing. I’m in my early 30′s, and I know my HGH production levels are due to drop off depressingly quickly. I know I need to mix it up with interval training and other methods to trigger HGH production and keep myself at a level of fitness that won’t frustrate me. I’ve been working on that. It’s not fun. I bought a new bike, and live on a 71 mile, scenic bike trail. I plan on riding a great deal this summer, and hope that will be one of my primary avenues to staying lean. I’m still a very fit guy, I think, but a week or so ago I tipped the scales at a higher number (188) than I think I may ever have hit before. That scared me into action.
I did some reading, and it seems that science has changed a great deal on me in the past several years. Much of what I’m reading now suggests that I was actually misguided all along, and that the optimal number of reps for growth is 12+, rather than the 6-8 for failure that I’ve done for decades (which actually developed strength, moreso than size). Ironically, I have no real desire to get any more muscular than I already am. I’ve grown out of the delusion that more massively muscular is necessarily better or more attractive, and am much more interested in maintaining a strong, fit, youthful physique, for as long as humanly possible, to optimize my overall health and keep me feeling good about the way I look. Still, it seems the 12+ rep approach will have a number of benefits that I just can’t deny. First, it is a massive move towards muscle confusion. I’ve had similar workouts for way too long, and I’m sure I’ve generally plateaued. Second, higher repetitions will likely burn more calories, (provided they are sufficiently intense), and will further my goal of keeping lean and advancing my overall health. Finally, if they do in fact trigger more HGH production, and even if they build more muscle in the short-term, these benefits will definitely advance my overall health and fitness goals. So… I decided to do it. And it has me thinking. This morning at the gym, the metaphor of this change in approach seemed almost humerously obvious.
The hardest part is not the change in routine. Not by a long shot. It’s fun doing things a little differently, especially when I’ve been pretty consistent in my approach for years. What’s really difficult for me is managing the implications for my own ego. It’s a little embarassing to say, but I’m realizing there is a part of me that likes knowing I’m working with the heaviest weights in the gym. Dialing that down to the weight I would have used years ago, to enable myself to do more than 12 reps with reasonably good form is a psychological challenge. I feel, somewhat irrationally, like people notice. It’s silly, I know.
Still, the reality is that, based on just two workouts using the new approach, the pump is definitely more dramatic. That could just be attributable to the change, and to muscle confusion, but it’s very real.
But enough about the physical side of this. What is more interesting for me is the metaphor, which I spent most of my workout this morning chewing on. Let me restate the conclusions from above in a way that makes the broader application bubble up: By recognizing my changed circumstances, and and re-calibrating my approach to better align with my long-term goals, I know I am improving the probability that I’ll achieve my desired results. However, the process of doing so is psychologically challenging, primarily because of my tendency to be-for-others, and my preoccupation, at times, with my presumptions of their perceptions.
Much like my low-rep workouts, I’ve spend much of my life rabidly and relentlessly chasing professional accomplishments, accolades, and validation. This approach has generally served me well, in my opinion. I am a Vice President of what I believe to be one of the greatest companies in the world, and I’m young. I have lots of “stuff”, that I probably enjoy more than I should. I’m not a rich guy, by any stretch of the imagination, but I have a good life, and I think it’s more balanced than most people who enjoy similar luxuries or who have made similar decisions (e.g., law school). Still, I’m feeling like it may me time to re-calibrate. Maybe it’s time to adjust my behaviors to re-orient them towards the goals I have now, to the extent they’re pointing me to the goals I had when I initially developed them. This may pose similar ego challenges. I’m not sure yet, as I’m not yet sure what the re-calibration will entail. Maybe I’ve already been experimenting in small ways, with things like the guitar lessons. Maybe I have the discipline, now, to take a longer view, and aim for wins that are further out, and may not validate my incremental success as frequently. The idea that I can move less weight, more times, in ways that might not impress the casual observer, and in so doing achieve a greater long term net benefit to myself, is compelling.